<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ILOM wherefor art thou?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.digitar.com/jjww/2006/07/ilom-wherefor-art-thou/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.digitar.com/jjww/2006/07/ilom-wherefor-art-thou/</link>
	<description>thoughts &#38; musings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 02:26:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://blogs.digitar.com/jjww/2006/07/ilom-wherefor-art-thou/comment-page-1/#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-359</guid>
		<description>Which version of ILOM did this box have?  1.0 and 1.0.7 can certainly be expected to be flaky, and to lock up over time.  1.1.8 and the 2.0 update are much better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><code>Which version of ILOM did this box have?  1.0 and 1.0.7 can certainly be expected to be flaky, and to lock up over time.  1.1.8 and the 2.0 update are much better.</code></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
